RE: [WSG] Text choices on our own sites

[Paul Noone]

You know, you CAN be semantic to a point. Usability is directly related to accessibility. If a site's unusable, ot difficult to navigate, then it is inaccessible. Nuff said, peeps. Let's get back to some real work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Czeiger Sent: Monday, 31 October 2005 11:30 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Text choices on our own sites Actually James, I think this is more a Usability concern rather than an Accessibility concern. What you might say instead is:   "I can't view the site on my browser and even if I could, the text is samll and I can't change it!" Or   "Why does this site tell me I need to have _javascript_ turned on? How do I even do that?"   R  :o)     ----- Original Message ----- From: James Ellis To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 10:18 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] Text choices on our own sites Hi Everyone cares about accessibility, both consciously and/or subsconsciously. "I hate this website, I can't find anything on it. I'm going somewhere else" - that's someone caring about accessibility. Cheers James On 10/31/05, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a thought, I wanted to point something out.  No one cares about standards or accessibility but us.  Its our job to care.