Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote:
Roberto:
You miss the css stylesheets as xml. Try this page for see the difference
in the source code: http://www.fruibile.it
What's the point of defining the stylesheet both with the xml-stylesheet
instruction AND the (valid, and clearly defined in XHTML 1.1) link
element? As far as I was aware, both methods are just as acceptable.
Additionally: what's the purpose of the conditional comment in this case?
<?xml-stylesheet charset="utf-8" href="/css.asp?cssid=1&csstype=1"
type="text/css" media="all" alternate="no" ?>
<!--[if IE]>
<?xml-stylesheet charset="utf-8" href="/css.asp?cssid=1&csstype=1"
type="text/css" media="all" alternate="no" ?>
<![endif]-->
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
