On the W3C website they give a first example of a definition list with
terms (dt) and definitions (dd) but then give another example where dt
is a speaker and dd is the speech so they concede that it is legitimate
where the logic is similar.
But does the following make sense and is it accessible?
It does validate.
<h2>Contacts</h2>
<dl>
<dt class="first">John Smith</dt>
<dd class="first">
<dl>
<dt>Address:</dt>
<dd>
<p>13 My Road
<br />MyTown
<br />MyCounty AB1 2CD
</p>
</dd>
<dt>Phone/fax:</dt>
<dd><p>01234 567 890</p></dd>
<dt>Mobile:</dt>
<dd><p>07890 123456</p></dd>
<dt>Email:</dt>
<dd><p><a href="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL
PROTECTED]</a></p></dd>
<dt>skype:</dt>
<dd><p> my skype</p></dd>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
Kind Regards
--
Chris Price
Choctaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.choctaw.co.uk
Tel. 01524 825 245
Mob. 0777 451 4488
Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder
while Excellence is in the Hand of the Professional
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-+- Sent on behalf of Choctaw Media Ltd -+-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Choctaw Media Limited is a company
registered in England and Wales
with company number 04627649
Registered Office:
Lonsdale Partners,
Priory Close,
St Mary's Gate,
Lancaster LA1 1XB
United Kingdom
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
