> On Behalf Of Chris Price > On the W3C website they give a first example of a definition list with > terms (dt) and definitions (dd) but then give another example where dt > is a speaker and dd is the speech so they concede that it is legitimate > where the logic is similar. > > But does the following make sense and is it accessible? > > It does validate. > > <h2>Contacts</h2> > <dl> > <dt class="first">John Smith</dt> > <dd class="first"> > <dl> > <dt>Address:</dt> > <dd> > <p>13 My Road > <br />MyTown > <br />MyCounty AB1 2CD > </p> > </dd> > > <dt>Phone/fax:</dt> > <dd><p>01234 567 890</p></dd> > > <dt>Mobile:</dt> > <dd><p>07890 123456</p></dd> > > <dt>Email:</dt> > <dd><p><a > href="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a></p></dd> > > <dt>skype:</dt> > <dd><p> my skype</p></dd> > </dl> > </dd> > </dl>
If you're willing to go with that many elements, why not using microformats? http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
