"No, not madness. Instead, it would be a good way to bring art to audiences that might not otherwise know it."
Yes, but once you start applying that logic inside legislated rules of presentation and usage (which is the issue here, or will be), a site can no longer be the art the artist desires. "However, if it _is_ different, then we should apply it because we can, because it's the right thing to do and because a commercial site open to more users will generate more sales, just by the law of averages." Yes, we should, laws shouldn't mandate it. When you take away the ability to choose the right path and instead force it on a person, that person looses the ability to be good as they never choose to do good, it's forced on them - yes? ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
