that is by far the most profound statement ive heard regarding web 2.0 totally spot on. funny how simple things become when you look at it that way...
love your work. On 2/13/08, Stuart Foulstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Web 2.0 is basically what Web 1.0 was meant to be, before it was hijacked > by commerce, i.e. collaborative information sharing, social networking, > etc. > > The difference is that nowadays we have Web technologies which make this > much easier and more extensive, e.g. Wikipedia and other wikis, blogs, rss > feeds etc. > > I guess, from a design point of view, Web 2.0 is creating Websites which > incorporate these technologies. > > Stuart > > On Tue, February 12, 2008 10:52 pm, Katrina wrote: > > kevin mcmonagle wrote: > >> yes its a buzzword mostly but from a design standpoint its also a > genre. > >> > >> > > That's an interesting thought. Is Web 2.0 larger than the web itself? > > Has it become an art movement/period, in the same way as Modernism, > > Post-Modernism, Humanism, Impressionism, etc? > > > > Kat > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ******************************************************************* > > > > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
