>  I recall reading somewhere that 'accesskey' is often considered more
>  hindrance than benefit because there are no standardised keys for
>  specific functions and it inevitably ends up conflicting with regular
>  browser shortcuts that keyboard users or screenreader users are
>  likely to wish to utilise.

I would have to generally agree with that. What makes matters worse is
the fact that there is no really good/standard behaviour that browser
vendors actually follow in implementing them. I was referring to point
9.5 in  http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/#gl-device-independence
when I made the comment, and was interested Mike's perspective for not
using them in this circumstance. I guess since there are only three
links, accesskeys become trivial as they probably won't save any time
anyway. I still think there is a case for accesskey's in many
circumstances however unpopular they are, lets not forget about mobile
access etc.

Anywho thanks for the comments guys!

Matt


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to