Seems like a good idea, any implications?
2008/5/28 Rick Lecoat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 28 May 2008, at 11:31, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > >> Me too. IE/win shows title-text on images when such exists, otherwise it >> shows the alt-text if such exists. > > For this reason I quite often use a null-value title attribute alongside > filled-in alt text, simply because I don't *want* tooltips in my pages. This > means that the alt text is there for those who need/want it, but image-savvy > users aren't pestered by yellow text boxes popping up every time they happen > to mouse over an image. > > Is this (eg: <img src="bb.jpg" alt="Big Ben clocktower in London" title="" > /> something that the panel would condone or condemn? > > -- > Rick Lecoat > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
