There is the argument that you are changing the behaviour of IE, however wrong it is, it could be what users expect. I believe Jaws ignores empty attributes so all good there ...
2008/5/28 Darren West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Seems like a good idea, any implications? > > > 2008/5/28 Rick Lecoat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On 28 May 2008, at 11:31, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: >> >>> Me too. IE/win shows title-text on images when such exists, otherwise it >>> shows the alt-text if such exists. >> >> For this reason I quite often use a null-value title attribute alongside >> filled-in alt text, simply because I don't *want* tooltips in my pages. This >> means that the alt text is there for those who need/want it, but image-savvy >> users aren't pestered by yellow text boxes popping up every time they happen >> to mouse over an image. >> >> Is this (eg: <img src="bb.jpg" alt="Big Ben clocktower in London" title="" >> /> something that the panel would condone or condemn? >> >> -- >> Rick Lecoat >> >> >> >> ******************************************************************* >> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm >> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm >> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> ******************************************************************* >> >> > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
