On Sep 25, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
tee wrote:
I was thinking maybe it's a SEO question and shouldn't post it
here, however, the more I think about it, the more I feel it
deserves a semantical perspective and wonder if it creates
obstacle for screen reader.
Might be seen as "noise", but can't see any other problems with
otherwise meaningful duplication of links.
On <http://www.sitepoint.com/> you'll find 3 links to same page for
each
of their main posts, and I don't think it hurts. Don't think it helps
either for that matter.
I was still thinking about this thing...
As far as SEO concerns, it seems to have an advantage because google
image search and a few other image search engines (can't remember
their names). This seems to be very useful for sites that sell
products, image stock and photographers
But no good for screen reader I guess. Without one to test from, I
imagine the screen reader reads each links?!
tee
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
