To follow up on Micky, Christian and Rimantas, here's the latest info on HTML 5:
HTML 5 Draft Recommendation — 20 November 2008: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ The Web Developer's Guide to HTML 5 - W3C Editor's Draft 19 November 2008 (written by my colleague, Lachlan Hunt): http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-author/ Med vennlig hilsen / Kind regards, Frank M. Palinkas Technical Writer Opera Software http://www.opera.com/ http://dev.opera.com/articles/accessibility/ http://frank.helpware.net On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Rimantas Liubertas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > I made the same decision. I still follow HTML and XHTML, but anything I > do > > (and have a choice about) is always HTML 4.01 Strict. I think it makes > more > > sense than XHTML 1.0 Strict at this point since we can't really use > "real" > > XHTML yet. It seems to defeat the purpose if you are using a Strict DTD > > incorrectly. > > Same here and looking forward to start using HTML5, at least for the > personal projects first. > > Regards, > Rimantas > -- > http://rimantas.com/ > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
