Jon Gunderson wrote:
http://faetest.dres.uiuc.edu
Please let me know what you think of it.
First impression: good.
Informative page reports.
A few points...
1: i and b can in many cases not be replaced by h1..h6 or em and strong.
Both i and b are valid - span-like (no implied semantics) - elements in
HTML4/XHTML1, and are (so far) kept that way in (X)HTML5.
The existence of b and i should not be called a failure.
2: according to specs (and browsers) a character encoding stated in an
xml declaration is good, and further stating unnecessary.
No warning should be given in such a case.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************
