Not a bad read.
I'm about halfway in between your view and "accessibility all the time".
I do agree that there is a lot of accessibility for the sake of
accessibility, however, there are also lots of things that are so easy
to do that they should always be done, even if your target market
doesn't explicitly need that.
Thanks for the interesting read.
- Christian
On 1/29/2010 9:09 AM, Jason Grant wrote:
Hello friends,
I was going to post a big debate on 'Why accessibility doesn't matter'
to this list, but have delegated it to a blog post on the similar
subject instead.
I feel there has been LOADS of 'accessibility is a must' type
discussion on this list, but at the same time I feel that there is
loads of arguments which are essentially 'accessibility for the sake
of accessibility'.
My point is that we are heading towards the times where 'relevant
accessibility' is more important than 'accessibility' per se.
Please have a read of my article and comment via email or on the blog itself.
http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/accessibility-does-not-matter/
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Jason
--
Christian Snodgrass
CEO - Azure Ronin
http://www.arwebdesign.net
http://www.htmlblox.com
Phone: 859.816.7955
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************
