No, it's proprietary approach, not a standards approach. It's like when people said that the very "popularity" of IE means we don't need to deal with other browsers. I don't think that was healthy.
On Thu, April 1, 2010 8:57 pm, tee wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > >> This e-book is good: >> >> <http://mobilewebbook.com/> >> > I have this ebook. Second it. > > Isn't the very popularity of iphone, iTouch and now iPad have set a new > direction for mobile web? At least from where I see it, it's a healthy, > less money-wasting and more standard-compliant approach that we don't need > to deal with many mobile web applications > > tee > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
