Use Google Chrome and add different user-agent scripts/texts/parameters + user CSS3 media queries. You will allways find what you want using those two things.
Ar cieņu, Kristaps Ancāns Mob.: +371 29831831 E-pasts: kristaps.anc...@gmail.com Skype: kristaps.ancans Web: www.fyfi.net, www.metalguide.org On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 01:11, Steve Green <steve.gr...@testpartners.co.uk>wrote: > We use two online services - www.perfectomobile.com and > www.deviceanywhere.com. These are not emulators - in both cases you are > remotely controlling real phones. > > The theory is great but in practice both services are painful to use for > all kinds of reasons including: > > 1. There is a significant delay between pressing a button and seeing > anything change. > > 2. The display takes a while to update, which makes it difficult to control > dynamic content and watch video. > > 3. Sometimes we could not work out how to interact with the phones. For > instance one phone was locked and it took ten minutes to figure out the > combination of keypresses (of unlabelled buttons) that was required to > unlock it. If you are not already familiar with the phone you are > controlling, this is a significant issue. > > 4. On several phones we were able to open a browser but could not work out > how to enter a URL. The smartphones mostly support touch, so you can > interact using a mouse, but you can't do that on the more basic phones. The > support information is poor on both websites. > > 5. Security is a concern because we are often working under NDA for major > brands on highly secret product releases. Perfecto Mobile simply say that > anything you do might be seen by other people, so don't do anything you > wouldn't want made public. > > Device Anywhere claim that each session is private and that they have some > sort of cleaning process before the next person uses the phone. However, on > one occasion I could see everything that someone else was doing (in real > time as they were doing it) and I could not control the phone. Somehow our > sessions had got mixed up, which gave me no confidence in their security. > > 6. Overall it takes much longer to perform any given task - typically 3 to > 10 times longer than you could do the task using a desktop browser. Even > typing URLs was taking a couple of minutes (they typically contained 50 > characters or so), so we had to use a URL shortening service to speed that > up. > > Good luck and let us know if you find a better service. > > Steve Green > Director > Test Partners Ltd > > > ________________________________ > > From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org on behalf of Sean K > Sent: Sun 27/03/2011 00:28 > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: [WSG] Mobile testing methods or emulators > > > Hi All, > > I was wondering if anyone could give me an idea how to test sites for > mobiles? I'd like to test Blackberry, HTC and IPhone and I was wondering > what methods and or tools other people are using for this? > > Thanks in advance. > > Sean > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
