Hi, It's worth looking at what W3C has to say - see http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/Overview.html - but it depends what your goals are. Do you want to pick up as many code-level issues as possible or undertake a conformance check in accordance with the WCAG 2.0 standard?
Cheers, Andrew Andrew Boyd faci...@gmail.com http://uxbookclub.org -- connect, read, discuss On 25/06/2011, at 2:15 AM, "Spellacy, Michael" <michael.spell...@tmp.com> wrote: > Hi WSG Friends! > > The company I work for is considering dropping WatchFire for testing > because of the price. I'm really concerned about not being able to test > code against specific accessibility guidelines like WCAG 1.0 or 2.0. Do > any of you know of any cheaper (or free) applications that do just as > good a job? > > Thanks in advance for any recommendations you may have! > > Regards, > Spell > > Michael Spellacy > Lead User Interface Developer > TMP Worldwide Advertising & Communications, LLC > 125 Broad Street, 10th Floor > New York, NY 10004 > www.tmp.com > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
