Hi Bill,
>> Note also that if we have success with using OpenMP elsewhere in the
>> program, we'll need to use an FFTW library compiled with
>> "--enable-openmp".
> I am hoping that is not the case and that normal multi-threaded FFTW3
> can be used in parallel to OpenMP, otherwise other builders of WSJT-X
> are going to have several hurdles to overcome.
OK. We might also consider *not* using multi-threaded FFTs. The
performance gain is not big.
> I am currently setting up the CMake build to build two versions of jt9,
> jt9 and jt9_omp which should be good for testing and development until
> we have a feel for if this all hangs together and has a performance
> benefit worth the price.
OK, sounds good.
I am presently making some more careful measurements of decoder speed
under various conditions.
-- Joe
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
