Hi All, OK, take 2:- here's a new test version:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4192709/wsjtx-1.4.0-rc3-win32-r4996-genmsg.exe I would like some testing by someone with a type 1 compound call and especially by someone with a type 2 compound call. If you can work each other; better still ;) This includes much better decode highlighting, processing and logging for those with compound call signs. The message generation is coded as below (all messages are default ones generated by double clicking decodes). ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Type 1 compound call calls CQ: CQ KP2/W1AW W1AW G4WJS IO91 G4WJS W1AW -15 W1AW G4WJS R-10 G4WJS W1AW RRR W1AW G4WJS 73 G4WJS W1AW 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Type 1 compound call answers CQ: CQ G4WJS IO91 G4WJS KP2/W1AW W1AW G4WJS -10 G4WJS W1AW R-15 W1AW G4WJS RRR G4WJS W1AW 73 W1AW G4WJS 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Type 2 compound call calls CQ: CQ TI4/N0URE EK70 N0URE G4WJS IO91 G4WJS N0URE -18 N0URE G4WJS R-20 G4WJS N0URE RRR N0URE G4WJS 73 DE TI4/N0URE 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Type 2 compound call answers CQ: CQ G4WJS IO91 DE TI4/N0URE EK70 N0URE G4WJS -20 G4WJS N0URE R-18 N0URE G4WJS RRR DE TI4/N0URE 73 N0URE G4WJS 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Type 1 compound call works another type 1 compound call: CQ KP2/W1AW W1AW VE/G4WJS G4WJS W1AW -06 W1AW G4WJS R-07 G4WJS W1AW RRR W1AW G4WJS 73 G4WJS W1AW 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Type 2 compound call works another type 2 compound call: CQ TI4/N0URE EK70 DE T6/G4WJS MM44 G4WJS N0URE -13 N0URE G4WJS R -11 G4WJS N0URE RRR DE T6/G4WJS 73 DE TI4/N0URE 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Type 1 compound call worked by type 2 compound call: CQ KP2/W1AW DE TI4/N0URE EK70 N0URE W1AW +03 W1AW N0URE R+06 N0URE W1AW RRR DE TI4/N0URE 73 N0URE W1AW 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Type 2 compound call worked by type1 compound call: CQ TI4/N0URE EK70 N0URE KP2/W1AW W1AW N0URE +06 N0URE W1AW R+03 W1AW N0URE RRR N0URE W1AW 73 DE TI4/N0URE 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In the case where a type 2 compound call needs to reply off the calling frequency of a CQ caller the Tx1 message generated is not suitable as it doesn't contain the called station call sign. In that case the best option would be to manually edit the message as follows: CQ P5WJS PM29 DE TI4/N0URE EK70 would be substituted by: P5WJS N0URE EK70 This means that only the 73 message will contain the full call and it would be down to the DX station to correctly log the full compound call sign. This is not a particularly pleasant trade off but I don;t see a better option. As before testing, comments and, suggestions most welcome. 73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
