Hi Steve,

To be honest, I think particular testing is best left to those of you 
that know exactly what's going on and how best to test it. I would 
probably just add confusion to the subject at this point.

Presently, the WSJT-X build script on Linux compiles wsprd_exp, but it 
is not copying too / overwritting the wsprd binary ( if I recall 
correctly ). If this is something desired for Windows, I could add the 
commands to build it for testing.

I'm working on a couple of updates for JTSDK Win32 to enable / disable 
Qt5.5 testing. After that I'll give it a shot and post my findings to 
you all off list so as to not clog up the devel list with my wayward 
ramblings :-)

73's
Greg, KI7MT

On 7/28/2015 1:49 PM, Steven Franke wrote:
> Hi Greg and Joe,
>
> As Joe said, the stack decoder is only in wsprd_exp and it requires a 
> command-line argument (-J) to activate it, as the default algorithm in 
> wsprd_exp is the Fano algorithm.
>
> The tests conducted by me and Joe show that my implementation of Jelinek’s 
> stack-bucket algorithm doesn’t seem to provide any significant advantage over 
> the Fano decoder in the wspr application. I am still inclined to replace the 
> current wsprd with the Fano version of wsprd_exp. All of my tests indicate 
> that the default configuration of wsprd_exp produces more decodes in less 
> time than wsprd does. This is due to improvements in the sync algorithm and 
> not due to anything related to the sequential decoder. However --- when Joe 
> compared wsprd to wsprd_exp (Fano) he didn’t find any significant difference 
> between the two. If you decide to do some tests, Greg, it’d be interesting to 
> see if you see any difference between wsprd and wsprd_exp (with the default 
> settings).
>
> Steve
>
>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Joe Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> The experimental ("Jelinek") decoder is currently being built only as
>> wsprd_exp.
>>              -- Joe
>>
>> On 7/28/2015 3:08 PM, Greg Beam wrote:
>>> Hi Joe, Steve,
>>>
>>> Are these updates in the main wsprd binary, or do we still need to build
>>> the wsprd_exp binary and copy it over to wsprd to test the changes?
>>>
>>> 73's
>>> Greg, KI7MT
>>>
>>> On 7/28/2015 12:22 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>
>>>> Nice job with implementation of a sequential decoder using the Jelinek
>>>> Stack Algorithm!
>>>>
>>>> I have now run some reasonably thorough tests of it, comparing results
>>>> with the default Fano decoder in wsprd. I confirm essentially all of
>>>> your basic conclusions.  Jelinek with maxcycles=5000 produces nearly the
>>>> same results, in the same execution time, as Fano with maxcycles=10000.
>>>>
>>>> In my tests the command-line "-d" option produced about 7-8% more
>>>> decodes, at the cost of roughly 5 x longer execution time.  Again, this
>>>> was true for both Fano and Jelinek.
>>>>
>>>> Now we know... which is good!
>>>>
>>>>    -- Joe, K1JT
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to