I have noticed that the new 1.6.1 does not decode as well as 1.5 on JT65-JT9 mode. I have a Flex 6500 and can set up to 4 JT65 sessions. When a new version comes out I always set up the old and new versions to see if any improvement. Sadly, 1.6.1 misses several "Q"s that the 1.5 displays on each minute segment. On a positive note the JT9 FAST works very well. Have made a handful of contacts on 6M & 10M. Hope this helps.
Bill W2PKY On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Bill Somerville <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27/08/2015 22:50, Richard Stanley wrote: > > Hi Bill > > Hi Richard, > > > My soundcard was on 44 changed it to 48 and it now decodes everything that > the jt65-fh variants decode. > I didn’t think jt65-hf in either variant would decode stuff that wsjt-x > couldn’t and it was a wrong setting here. > I will post the same info where I saw the original comment that got me to > do the limited test. > It was on 48 but recently upgraded to win10 and it must have reset it to > 44 ? > > Thanks for the update, that is an interesting data point. It seems that > the Windows 10 upgrade is not very robust in preserving user defined driver > settings. Elsewhere I have seen reports of USB enumerations being reset > during a Windows 10 upgrade also. > > > Richard m0clz > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > > > *From:* Bill Somerville <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:09 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx decodes > > On 27/08/2015 22:01, Richard Stanley wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > I have been reading people saying that wsjt-x is missing decodes so I got > jt65-hf and jt65-hf-hp9hqx but disabled ptt on the jt65hf versions and left > them running. > jt65-hf-hb9hqx consistently decodes stuff that wsjt-x misses out, at 19:13 > wsjt-x reports nothing but the jt65-hf-hb9hqx decodes 2 signals ? > They are all using the same soundcard and radio ? > > I have attached a screenshot of the very limited test that I carried out. > The wsjtx version was 5819 > > Ensure that you have set the default soundcard sample rate to at least > 48kHz, this is required for WSJT-X to perform correctly. AFAIK the JT65-HF > programs use an 11.25kHz sample stream which will be optimally derived from > a soundcard set at 44.1kHz. 44.1kHz sample rate is usually the default and > is considered the consumer maximum sample rate. > > You should be aware that the jt65-hf variants all use the same decoding > engine which was released with an old variant of WSJT and we are quite > confident that the decoding ability of the current WSJT-X is considerably > improved in both speed and resolution over that rather ancient version. > > > Richard m0clz > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
