Highly unscientific, but suggestive test - compiled WSJTX 1.6.1 (6015) and ran it in parallel with 1.5.0 on the same Win10 machine. Very often r6015 produced 1-2 more valid decodes per cycle on 40 meters this evening. I'm not sure if I'm seeing the results of a second decode pass, but the r6015 decodes came in two batches. The first were almost exactly in time with 1.5.0, but the second came through maybe a half second later. Well within enough time to assess and respond.
Haven't been able to successfully compile for Mac OSX yet (sure it's my error). Looking forward to trying both versions there, too. 73, George J. Molnar @GJMolnar - KF2T - AFA9GM > On Oct 27, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Joe Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Steve and all, > > I've run some further tests with the two-pass JT65 decoder, using a > collection of 473 *.wav files recorded at 14.076 MHz. Here's a quick > summary of results: > > Program Decodes Time > -------------------------------------------- > WSJT-X v1.6.0 v5636 (kvasd) 2270 230 s > jt65 (1 pass, sfrsd2) 2296 767 > jt65 (2 passes, sfrsd2) 2819 2144 > > Note that although the 2-pass decoder is significantly slower than the > others, it still takes less than 5 s per .wav file, on average. This is > perfectly acceptable performance -- especially since the all-important > decode at the QSO frequency always happens first, and will generally be > done in less than a second. > > -- Joe, K1JT > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
