Hi George, At the moment, the two-pass decoding scheme is implemented only in the command-line test program jt65. The differences that you were seeing between v1.5 and v1.6.1 would be due to different synching schemes and also slight differences between kvasd and sfrsd2 performance. 73 Steve k9an
> On Oct 27, 2015, at 11:24 PM, George J Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Highly unscientific, but suggestive test - compiled WSJTX 1.6.1 (6015) and > ran it in parallel with 1.5.0 on the same Win10 machine. Very often r6015 > produced 1-2 more valid decodes per cycle on 40 meters this evening. I'm not > sure if I'm seeing the results of a second decode pass, but the r6015 decodes > came in two batches. The first were almost exactly in time with 1.5.0, but > the second came through maybe a half second later. Well within enough time to > assess and respond. > > Haven't been able to successfully compile for Mac OSX yet (sure it's my > error). Looking forward to trying both versions there, too. > > 73, > > George J. Molnar > @GJMolnar - KF2T - AFA9GM > >> On Oct 27, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Joe Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Steve and all, >> >> I've run some further tests with the two-pass JT65 decoder, using a >> collection of 473 *.wav files recorded at 14.076 MHz. Here's a quick >> summary of results: >> >> Program Decodes Time >> -------------------------------------------- >> WSJT-X v1.6.0 v5636 (kvasd) 2270 230 s >> jt65 (1 pass, sfrsd2) 2296 767 >> jt65 (2 passes, sfrsd2) 2819 2144 >> >> Note that although the 2-pass decoder is significantly slower than the >> others, it still takes less than 5 s per .wav file, on average. This is >> perfectly acceptable performance -- especially since the all-important >> decode at the QSO frequency always happens first, and will generally be >> done in less than a second. >> >> -- Joe, K1JT >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
