HI Joe-
Just thought I would report it. It's not bothering me as I know what causes it. May be an issue for others if the on JT9 with a lot of additional JT9 stations. I See you on 160 tonight. Looks like Eu is coming through for the northern US stations. SA here so far. 73; Good DX Bill W2PKY On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > OK, I now understand what you're reporting. Version 1.6.1 r5910 is > quite a while back, code-revision wise. > > I tried to reproduce your effect with the current revision, r6041. I do > see a small difference that depends on Rx freq: maybe one or two > additional decoding seconds, with a total of around 15 decodes. > > I can't tell you the exact reason for this dependence, without > additional work. I don't see it as especially important -- but would > like to understand why it's apparently "working harder" when Rx Freq is > high. I'll look into it further, when time permits. > > -- 73, Joe, K1JT > > On 11/2/2015 6:10 PM, Bill Barrett wrote: > > Hi Joe- > > > > My observation is that the total time to decode the received signals is > > influenced by the setting of the RX frequency. > > IE if setting the RX @ 300 Hz all decoding [65& 9] proceeds rapidly. > > if setting the RX to 2K or above the JT9 prints are delayed > significantly. > > My computer is a 4Ghz CPU with 8 Ex units. > > Hope this helps. > > > > Bill W2PKY > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Joe Taylor<j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > > > >> Hi Bill, > >> > >> I'm not sure that I understand your point. In JT9+JT65 mode, JT9 > >> decoding is attempted only at frequencies above the "blue line" marker, > >> set by the "JT65 nnnn JT9" spinner control. Decoding is always started > >> first at the selected Rx frequency and mode, so the decode you care most > >> about -- presumably the station you're trying to work -- comes out first > >> among all those in its mode. If you have a slow computer (or for some > >> other reason) some decodes come out after the top of the minute, it's > >> not a big concern. > >> > >> Have I mis-understood what was bothering you? > >> > >> -- 73, Joe, K1JT > >> > >> On 11/2/2015 4:08 PM, Bill Barrett wrote: > >>> Hello JT Developers- > >>> > >>> Running 1.6.1 5910, noticed when mode is set to JT65 + 9 > >>> and the RX frequency is greater than 1500 the JT9 decoding takes a long > >>> time. > >>> If the RX is above 2000 and there are a few JT9 prints the last one > could > >>> come at second 59. > >>> > >>> Regularly decode signals -26 -27 -28. > >>> > >>> 73, Bill W2PKY > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Joe Taylor<j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Here's an amusing screen shot. > >>>> > >>>> WSJT-X was running with 2-pass decoding enabled for JT65. Note the > two > >>>> decodes of WB9OTX at Freq = 1856 Hz. Evidently he changed his Tx > >> message > >>>> from "HA3LI WBtOTX -21" to "HA3LI WBtOTX 73" in mid-transmission. The > >>>> decoder gets the "73" message in its first pass, and the "-21" message > >> in > >>>> the second pass. > >>>> > >>>> -- Joe, K1JT > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> wsjt-devel mailing list > >>>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> wsjt-devel mailing list > >>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> wsjt-devel mailing list > >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
