Hi Joe-

My observation is that the total time to decode the received signals is
influenced by the setting of the RX frequency.
IE if setting the RX @ 300 Hz all decoding [65 & 9] proceeds rapidly.
if setting the RX to 2K or above the JT9 prints are delayed significantly.
My computer is a 4Ghz CPU with 8 Ex units.
Hope this helps.

Bill W2PKY

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote:

> Hi Bill,
>
> I'm not sure that I understand your point.  In JT9+JT65 mode, JT9
> decoding is attempted only at frequencies above the "blue line" marker,
> set by the "JT65 nnnn JT9" spinner control.  Decoding is always started
> first at the selected Rx frequency and mode, so the decode you care most
> about -- presumably the station you're trying to work -- comes out first
> among all those in its mode.  If you have a slow computer (or for some
> other reason) some decodes come out after the top of the minute, it's
> not a big concern.
>
> Have I mis-understood what was bothering you?
>
>         -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
> On 11/2/2015 4:08 PM, Bill Barrett wrote:
> > Hello JT Developers-
> >
> > Running 1.6.1 5910, noticed when mode is set to JT65 + 9
> > and the RX frequency is greater than 1500 the JT9 decoding takes a long
> > time.
> > If the RX is above 2000 and there are a few JT9 prints the last one could
> > come at second 59.
> >
> > Regularly decode signals -26 -27 -28.
> >
> > 73, Bill W2PKY
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Joe Taylor<j...@princeton.edu>  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Here's an amusing screen shot.
> >>
> >> WSJT-X was running with 2-pass decoding enabled for JT65.  Note the two
> >> decodes of WB9OTX at Freq = 1856 Hz.  Evidently he changed his Tx
> message
> >> from "HA3LI WBtOTX -21" to "HA3LI WBtOTX 73" in mid-transmission.  The
> >> decoder gets the "73" message in its first pass, and the "-21" message
> in
> >> the second pass.
> >>
> >>          -- Joe, K1JT
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wsjt-devel mailing list
> >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to