This brings up the idea that perhaps we should remember power level for each mode/band. So, for example, you're in 20M/JT65 and you switch to 30M you get the last 30M/JT65 power level you used, then switch to JT9 and get the last 30M/JT9 level you used.
I could work on that....it's not much different than remembering the tune power...just a wee bit more complex. I believe it be would generic enough so that any modes/bands added to WSJT-X would be automagically included since the code should be agnostic about band/mode combinations. Comments anybody? 73 Mike W9MDB On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Franco <[email protected]> wrote: > Goodmorning everyone. > I thank the whole team for their hard work. > Thanks for checking power in tune with memory. > It would help control power with memory tx JT9 different for JT65. > This seen in my use of power in two ways. > Merry Christmas 73 Franco iz0mit > > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: [email protected] > Data: 16/12/2015 16.54 > A: "WSJT software development"<[email protected]> > Ogg: Re: [wsjt-devel] Tune Power patch > > I added a sentence to each section talking about tuning. I tend to be > terse.... > Not sure it needs much more than this, does it? > > Mike W9MDB > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Bill Somerville <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 16/12/2015 14:46, Michael Black wrote: >> >> Oops...I though I had a clean branch...some leftovers in there from a >> prior debug. Shoulda' reviewed that patch myself before sending. >> It does have the m_settings->Setvalue in it. >> >> 73 >> Mike W9MDB >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Bill Somerville <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 16/12/2015 14:09, Michael Black wrote: >>> > This patch (attached) remembers where you set the Pwr slider during >>> tuning >>> > and restores it for subsequent tunes. Also restores it back after >>> tuning >>> > to wherever it was before tuning. >>> > It saves the result in the settings file so the level will be >>> > remembered across >>> > restarts too. >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> please review your patch as it seems to contain changes that are not >>> pertinent and I cannot see any saving of values between runs. >>> >>> 73 >>> Bill >>> G4WJS. >>> >> Hi Mike, >> >> thanks for that, committed to the development branch with the obvious >> defect in the patch fixed ;) >> >> There is probably a requirement for a User Guide patch as well to mention >> this "hidden" feature. >> >> 73 >> Bill >> G4WJS. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
