I'll agree that the voice stuff is a "nice to have". But maybe you can explain
the logic of the 500Hz window....100Hz would seem to make more sense and I
don't quite see the logic of 500Hz when it causes tuners to have to retune.
when changing offsets. Why 500 vs 100? That's a one-line change. 100Hz much
less retuning (probably zero)...500Hz frequent retuning...
I'm not going to keep changes in my code that mess with the ui code since it
really messes things up with merges so I'll just revert to non-gui changes.
RRRMike W9MDB
From: Joe Taylor <[email protected]>
To: WSJT software development <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2016 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Split audio frequency
Hi Mike,
One of the advantages of open source software is that anyone with
special needs or desires can study the code and learn enough to make the
changes needed to implement them. You have done the hard work and
evidently have solutions that suit your purposes (which, if I've
understood correctly, include automatic fine-tuning of your
transceiver's dial frequency and emitting male or female voice
announcements of certain program status conditions).
Of course you should feel free to hack your copy of the code to your
heart's content, for such purposes. However, I see no evidence of
widespread need or desire for such features in public versions of WSJT-X.
-- Joe, K1JT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
