Hi Joe and All,
There are my results on tuning r6373 FTRSD parameters for HF files:
file jt65_decode.f90:
line 102 thresh0=2.4
line 105 thresh0=1.0
file ftrsd.c:
line 135 thresh0[i]=1.2*perr[ii][jj];
Getting with original r6373 3054 correct JT65 decodes from my set of wav files.
Getting from tuned r6373 3240 correct JT65 decodes from the same set of wav
files.
JT65+JT9, Random erasure patterns = 8, Agressive decoding level=0
Still looking for the mentioned defect, there is some chance it is hidden in
the symbol metrics for FTRSD decoder.
73 Igor UA3DJY
>
>Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:34:32 -0500
>From: Joe Taylor < j...@princeton.edu >
>Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] possible defect in the FFT code
>To: WSJT software development < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
>Message-ID: < 56991f98.6030...@princeton.edu >
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
>Igor --
>
>Please feel free to tune the WSJT-X decoders in any way you see fit, and
>to use external bandpass filters on the data as you wish.
>
>One of the benefits of open-source code is that you can modify it as you
>desire. If you come up with code you believe is superior, I'm sure you
>will let us know.
>
>Right now our major focus and priorities lie in other directions.
>
>-- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
