Would it be a better practice to support only standard messages in automatic modes?
George J Molnar, KF2T Nevada, USA > On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:07 PM, Neil Zampella <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > Understood, the program is parsing the line to get the 73, but this needs to > be emphasized that a 73 must be in the line (hopefully an RR73 won't cause a > grid change) but I've seen stuff like QRZ 10W TU as a sign off nd that's it. > > Neil > > >> On 7/10/2017 3:58 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: >>> On 10/07/2017 20:50, Neil Zampella wrote: >>> Will using a non-standard message cause the receiving station's program to >>> not trigger their reply ?? >> >> Hi Neil, >> >> there is no need for a reply to a sign off message but if it contains the >> word "73" it should work the same as a standard 73 message. >> >> 73 >> Bill >> G4WJS. >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
