Sorry, it was in FT8 mode.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> thanks for this analysis. Which WSJT-X mode were you monitoring?
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
>
> On 21/02/2018 19:16, Doug Collinge wrote:
>
> This seems to have been swallowed. Apologies if there is a duplication...
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Doug Collinge <doug.colli...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:59 AM
> Subject:
>
> Memory Leak in jt9 Process
> To:
>
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
>
> There seems to be a memory leak in the jt9 process started by wsjtx. I
> have included a chart showing the memory use growing from about 20MiB to
> over 300MiB in the course of 11 hours. I set wsjtx to monitor 40m overnight
> and recorded the memory stats produced by /proc/*/statm at one minute
> intervals. The change in slope of the curves indicates the band opening and
> more signals being decoded.
>
> The configuration here is Ubuntu 17.10 with an RTL-SDR. gqrx demodulates
> USB, filters and feeds the audio to wsjt-x 1.9.0-rc1 using pulseaudio.
>
> Doug VE7GNU
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
