Bravo, George! Internet help with the decode? That's downright silly. If we are going to use the internet to replace even a portion of the performance of rf, heck why bother with rf at all, and we can have infinite sensitivity?
Hasan On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 6:13 PM George J Molnar <geo...@molnar.com> wrote: > While it probably is a remote possibility that the WSJT-X team is > contemplating adding internet-based linkages, I want to agree with N2ADV > and emphatically say “no!” to any ham radio communications protocol that > relies on anything but ham radio to work effectively. > > Even in this day of skimmers and spotting networks, automatic rotators, > and auto-sequenced contacts, the contact itself is still a radio contact, > and should remain so in its entirety. > > > *George J Molnar* > Arlington, Virginia, USA > KF2T - FM18lv > > > > > > > On Sep 8, 2018, at 6:38 PM, James Shaver <kd2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes but my previous question about Internet usage still stands: When I am > sitting in a park or out on a snowmobile trail with my KX3 and my laptop > using a GPS for time sync since there’s no cell reception there, anything > that relies on the Internet will be basically useless to me. Why would we > aim to exclude a growing number of such users like me? Perhaps I’m > misunderstanding. > > Jim S. > N2ADV > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
