FWIW I agree with the pro-73 group. It may be only a courtesy, but are we so enamored of getting the next QSO that courtesy is unnecessary? Contests are a different animal, but in day to day operation, I appreciate the courtesy. In addition the need is documented in the several places, not the least of which is the WSJT-X documentation, and as someone mentioned, may be required for QSO credit for an award.
__________ Dan – K4SHQ -----Original Message----- From: OG55W [mailto:og...@oh2j.info] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 4:04 AM To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Why73 - RRR or RR73 ---isn't it a waste of time ? 73 is only a compliment! QSO is OK, if both stations have given R . 73 Keijo OG55W -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- From: oe1...@oevsv.at Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:47 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Why73 - RRR or RR73 ---isn't it a waste of time ? Am 16.10.2018 um 09:04 schrieb IK1HJS Carlo De Mari: [snipped] Hi Carlo! In my opinion I would prefer 73's from both partners as confirmation of the QSO. Only then a QSO (in digital modes) is to be classified as being complete for me. vy73 Enrico, OE1EQW _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
