On 16/11/2020 12:43, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:36 AM Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com
<mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>> wrote:
On 16/11/2020 12:27, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:44 AM Bill Somerville
<g4...@classdesign.com <mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>> wrote:
Note that the 32-bit RPM package we provide is built on
Fedora 30
without issues.
Note that Fedora 30 is EOL and Fedora 31 will go EOL in the near
future now that Fedora 33 is released :)
Thanks,
Richard
KF5OIM
Hi Richard,
on 32-bit machines?
While Fedora doesn't build official 32bit installations anymore, I
don't believe there's been anything removed from the distro that would
prevent end users from producing 32bit binaries (32bit libraries are
still produced).
I'm not sure how you're producing the RPMs but the recommended method
of using mock still has chroots for i386 in current Rawhide/f33.
Thanks,
Richard
Hi Richard,
that would be alright for fully statically linked applications, but
there's not much point for applications that are going to be run on
Fedora 30 32-bit systems using dynamic linking to other packages. It's
easier to keep a Fedora 30 32-bit system going to build on, at least
until some package requirement forces us to keep an alternate version of
the sources, at that point we would probably drop support. We already
advertise our Intel Linux WSJT-X 32-bit support as deprecated.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
