>Hopefully, in an ideal world, it should be that WSJT-X waits for a second
>RR73 (hypothetical answer confirmation sequence I mean) from the remote
>station, before to definitely close and log the QSO.
Hi Marco,
I am not sure what you mean by the “second RR73”. There seems to be a generic
misunderstanding how the protocol is assumed to work. User Guide sections 7.1.
and 7.4. provide a nice advice. For a minimum QSO, where locator information is
exchanged:
CQ K1ABC FN42 #K1ABC calls CQ
K1ABC G0XYZ IO91 #G0XYZ answers
G0XYZ K1ABC –19 #K1ABC sends report
K1ABC G0XYZ R-22 #G0XYZ sends R+report
G0XYZ K1ABC RR73 #K1ABC sends RR73
K1ABC G0XYZ 73 #G0XYZ sends 73
The last message (73) is optional.
Relevant issue is that in none of the examples a station that receives RR73 is
sending back RR73, but 73 or nothing more for that call.
73, Reino OH3mA
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
