>Hopefully, in an ideal world, it should be that WSJT-X waits for a second >RR73 (hypothetical answer confirmation sequence I mean) from the remote >station, before to definitely close and log the QSO.
Hi Marco, I am not sure what you mean by the “second RR73”. There seems to be a generic misunderstanding how the protocol is assumed to work. User Guide sections 7.1. and 7.4. provide a nice advice. For a minimum QSO, where locator information is exchanged: CQ K1ABC FN42 #K1ABC calls CQ K1ABC G0XYZ IO91 #G0XYZ answers G0XYZ K1ABC –19 #K1ABC sends report K1ABC G0XYZ R-22 #G0XYZ sends R+report G0XYZ K1ABC RR73 #K1ABC sends RR73 K1ABC G0XYZ 73 #G0XYZ sends 73 The last message (73) is optional. Relevant issue is that in none of the examples a station that receives RR73 is sending back RR73, but 73 or nothing more for that call. 73, Reino OH3mA
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel