That's excactly the reason Eclipse legal stays away from BC. If we can get away from hardcoded dependency from BC JCE, it'd be awsome!
May be we can produce a list of compatible JCEs that can be used with WSS4J (including BC). Best Regards, George -----Original Message----- From: Fred Dushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:19 AM To: wss4j-dev Subject: IDEA patents and BouncyCastle Has the WSS4J team digested this discussion on apache-legal? [1] See the thread 'IDEA block cipher inclusion via the "bouncy castle" JCE provider': http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200508.mbox/d ate?1 I propose we remove the BouncyCastle JARs from our "other" distribution, and add a note in the release notes, saying that users must procure a copy of the BC jars themselves. -Fred [1] Thanks to Dan Kulp for pointing this out --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ********************************************************************** --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
