On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Fred Dushin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't look at it closely, but I had the impression that they yanked > a bunch of classes out of BC and copied them into geronimo, under the > org.apache.geronimo namespace. So using this JAR would require some > changes in WSS4J (which I've proposed, anyway). > > I think it would be less risky if we just forced users to download BC > themselves.
+1 > > I'm not sure what the implications are for testing, since we'll need > to do the same. > > Perhaps it's time for apache to start a JCE provider project. It'd be > lots of fun (some people get a thrill from that sort of thing, I > guess), but it would also be a lot of work. Werner has already done some work on it : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/juice/ Thanks, Ruchith > > -Fred > > > On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:37 AM, Ruchith Fernando wrote: > > > > > Seems like this [1] jar won't work : > > > > $ jarsigner -verify geronimo-util-1.0.jar > > jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable) > > > > Also I don't see any BC classes in the jar. > > > > Thanks, > > Ruchith > > > > 1. > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo-util/1.0/geronimo-util-1.0.jar > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I believe the geronimo folks already created a non-idea jar: > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo-util/1.0/geronimo-util-1.0.jar > > > > > > Not sure the state of it though or how well it works. > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Devs, > > > > > > > > I was thinking along the lines of a little pluggable piece of code, > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > > > > would let the user initialize the JCE, as needed. This code could > > > > > be dynamically loaded, and driven off configuration and findable on > > > > > the CLASSPATH (to hopefully mitigate race conditions with our > > > > > startup/initialization code). > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1. At the same time, it seems that people in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [1],[2] were interested in a bouncycastle jar w/o the algorithm > > > > included. IMHO, it would be great if we can get this done as this will > > > > remove the unnecessary hassle from the users to download it > > > > themselves. It seems David from BC was willing to do that [3], wonder > > > > what happened. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > nandana > > > > > > > > [1] - > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200508.mbox > > > > /[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] - > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200508.mbox > > > > /[EMAIL PROTECTED] [3] - > > > > http://www.bouncycastle.org/devmailarchive/msg05065.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > J. Daniel Kulp > > > Principal Engineer, IONA > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://blog.ruchith.org > > http://wso2.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://blog.ruchith.org http://wso2.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
