Hi, I think the reason for this is the fact that we have removed the bouncy castle jar from the lib [1] in this commit. Ant when we do an ant jar to build wss4j picks the jars from the lib directory and bouncycastle is no longer there. If I put bouncycastle in to the lib, everything works fine. So shall we include a note in the README.txt that people should download and copy the bouncycastle to lib before they build wss4j ?
thanks, nandana [1] - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=652149 On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Ruchith Fernando < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Fred, > > I just tried to build the wss4j-1.5.4 branch and it failed (test > report attached). > > If the release is cut on the latest revision of the branch then I have > to say -1 until we fix these issues. > > Thanks, > Ruchith > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Fred Dushin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, I've fixed the hard-coded references to WSS4J versions in any of > the > > docs, and I've added a ChangeLog.txt, which I generated from Jira. I've > > also added a Jira report to the maven plugin, so we can see which tickets > > were closed for 1.5.4. > > > > A test version of the site can be found at: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/site/> > > > > Note that at present, the release bits have NOT been updated on > > people.apache.org, and the tags/1_5_4 branch has not been updated, > either. > > > > Before re-spinning a release, I'd like to take a vote on whether we can > > release without a fix for > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-119 > > > > I'd say that if WSS-119 is not a regression, then we should release > without > > the fix. OTOH, if there is a strong feeling towards making the fix, then > > I'd be open to that, too -- it does apparently affect WCF interop, which > is > > pretty important, IMO. It will require that we withdraw the release, and > > start the test cycle over again. So far, it looks like Axis, CXF, and > > Tuscany are the parties with a stake in that. (The CXF testing I can do > > very easily) > > > > I can't say how far away we'd be on a 1.5.5, or even a 2.0 release. > > > > Also, could I ask whether any WSS4J contributors would like to be listed > in > > the contributors section of the web site? Speak up, and I'll add your > name, > > but I don't want to add names without permission -- well, except for Colm > :) > > > > -Fred > > > > On May 22, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Ruchith Fernando wrote: > > > >> Fred, > >> > >> Can we get these issues fixed that cut the release again please? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ruchith > >> > >> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Fred, > >>> > >>> I took a look and would be happy to +1 the release with the following > >>> comments: > >>> > >>> - In the README.txt file, this version number was not updated > >>> "Thus no specific installation is required. The wss4j-1.5.1.jar file > >>> could be included into ear or war files of enterprise or web > application > >>> servers." > >>> > >>> I would recommend not listing an explicit version number in this > section > >>> to avoid future problems. > >>> > >>> - I could find no change log as to what bug fixes or enhancements 1.5.4 > >>> made over the previous releases. > >>> > >>> - The front page for WSS4J has some broken links and lists the current > >>> release as 1.5.0 when in fact only 1.5.1, 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 are available > >>> from the download site. > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Tom Jordahl > >>> WS PMC member > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Fred Dushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10:48 AM > >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Cc: wss4j-dev > >>> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4 > >>> > >>> To the Apache Web Services community, > >>> > >>> We are currently in the process of a WSS4J 1.5.4 release, but we have > >>> only gotten 1 +1 vote from an Apache WS PMC member. (The only other > >>> votes cast have been 2 non-binding +1 votes). > >>> > >>> Could I ask Apache WS PMC members to look into this release? > >>> > >>> Here is the email trail on the vote: > >>> > >>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-wss4j-dev/200805.mbox/thread > >>> > >>> (using the subject "[VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4") > >>> > >>> Many thanks, > >>> > >>> Fred Dushin > >>> (release engineer for the Apache WSS4J 1.5.4 release) > >>> > >>> Begin forwarded message: > >>> > >>>> From: Fred Dushin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> Date: May 13, 2008 11:02:41 AM EDT > >>>> To: wss4j-dev <[email protected]> > >>>> Subject: [VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4 > >>>> > >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>>> Hash: SHA1 > >>>> > >>>> This is a call for votes for the wss4j-1.5.4 release. This release > >>>> has the same set of fixes as RC3, and should only differ in the > >>>> version name. > >>>> > >>>> The distribution can be found at the following URL: > >>>> > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/dist/> > >>>> > >>>> You can also point maven at the following URL to pull down the 1.5.4 > >>>> release POM, source, and class JARs: > >>>> > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/maven/> > >>>> > >>>> This vote will stay open for at least 72 hours. > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for all the effort made towards this release! > >>>> > >>>> Here is my (non-binding and advisory) +1 > >>>> > >>>> - -Fred > >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) > >>>> > >>>> iD8DBQFIKa1LKSQw0yA4Kl8RAoB0AKC+lD69QY4Q6tkwFk1ygWIAjRwuggCfXWA2 > >>>> 51quHxthvKqCIak6oWoXcDA= > >>>> =upU1 > >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> http://blog.ruchith.org > >> http://wso2.org > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > http://blog.ruchith.org > http://wso2.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
