John,
Thx for the reference. I hope this doesn't mean that in practice fixes will only get one PMC member looking at them.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Lanuti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/10/2006 05:27 PM
|
|
>From David on 10/03/2006
"This morning the PMC agreed to make official something that had become something of a defacto standard ...
committers can release a proposed fix, based on 1 positive review, as long as they are prepared to modify it
or retract it, if other PMC members had concerns. This is to help reduce "bottlenecks" and get it into a build quickly,
so it can be even better regression tested. "
John Lanuti
Software Engineer, IBM Rational
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t/l 441-7861
"Konstantin Komissarchik"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/10/2006 05:18 PM
|
|
David should correct my memory, but the way I remember the policy being stated in the last several dev meetings is... a fix can be released with only one PMC member approving, but the committer should be ready to rollback if other PMC members object when they get a chance to review. Whether that’s a good policy or not is a separate question.
- Konstantin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:12 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE defects
Chuck,
I think it depends on where we are in the cycle. If we are approaching a deadline then we need rapid response. However, as far as I understand, we still require 3 +1 votes. The note requesting approval is timestamped 10/09/2006 03:16 PM and when I reviewed the bugs, far less than 24 hours had elapsed. I think 48 hours is reasonable for business as usual. In my case, yesterday was a holiday in Canada so I didn't see the request until this morning. Also, some PMC members were travelling to the Eclipse Summit today. Let's give people a fair chance to comment on the bugs before they are released.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chuck Bridgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/10/2006 04:28 PM
|
|
Well we were told we could release because in the past getting 3 votes wasn't timely....
Maybe some clarification is needed.
Thanks - Chuck
Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)
Arthur Ryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/10/2006 04:18 PM
|
|
Chuck,
I've been reviewing these bugs and noticed that they are being released based on a single vote from David. I thought we required 3 votes. Has the process changed?
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chuck Bridgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/09/2006 03:16 PM
|
|
The J2EE Team here in RTP has several defect ready for PMC review:
158619 maj P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC performance [project creation] Need default setting for java output f...
158623 cri P1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC [performance] ComponentDeployable members() to recognize ...
158825 cri P1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI wst.comm 1.5.2 M152 PMC [emfWorkbench] Use of EMF2DOMAdapterImpl now requires OSGI
159026 maj P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC [hotbug][j2ee] 'EAR Libraries' does not include JAR files...
159158 cri P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC [j2ee] InvertClientJARDependencyCompoundOperation throwin...
159160 maj P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC [import/export] J2EE module import adds invalid reference
160019 maj P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC performance [modulecore] Problem with DependencyGraph timestamp checking
160226 maj P2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASSI jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC [modulecore] VirtualComponent: Concurrent Modification Ex...
links are below:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158619
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158623
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158825
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159026
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159158
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159160
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160019
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160226
Each defect has an explaination of the problem for justification, and also a detailed explaination of the fix involved.
These defects/patches have already undergone internal review and testing, and we'll be glad to provide any additional details if required.
Thanks - Chuck
Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries
and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev