I can help with the first question. That is the only place its used and is useful. (And, not sure its all that useful there, any more :)
Long ago, it was a place holder to use in "production builds" that did nothing, but during special "test builds" there would be a implementation included that would take certain performance measurements (at a cost of an overall slowdown, that was not desired for production builds). The source for it (if that's what you are asking about) might be in the old, archived, VE project. But, not too much too it, as I recall, other than some no-op classes which, as you imply, you can probably just guess at). Not sure where they put archived code, but the bug that refers to it is bug 346887 [1]. HTH [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=346887 From: Gerard Ryan <gali...@fedoraproject.org> To: wtp-dev@eclipse.org, Date: 03/16/2013 12:32 PM Subject: [wtp-dev] Questions for WTP in Fedora (and a patch!) Sent by: wtp-dev-boun...@eclipse.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, I'm involved with building some parts of webtools in Fedora. I'm currently in the process of preparing updates to 3.4.2, and I've run into a bug (for Fedora, not webtools): For Fedora packages, there can't be any bundled jar files involved in the build process, we must build everything from scratch. I've just noticed that we have overlooked perfmsr.jar that's included in org.eclipse.jem.util/org.eclipse.perfmsr.core.stub My question is, is there a feature somewhere that builds this jar, or is this the only place that it's useful/exists? If it's part of some feature from another project, I'll create a new package for that, and make it available for the build of this package. If not, then I'll figure out a way to build it in this package and link it to where it's expected to be. Also, I submitted a patch to an existing bug a couple of months ago. I'm not sure if I need to submit it somewhere else to get it accepted. Since I'm not a committer, I don't have access to Gerrit to propose it there. The bug is at: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265772 If there's anything that you think needs to be changed for that to be accepted, let me know and I'll try to get it done. Thanks in advance for any guidance, Gerard. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRRJ5/AAoJEG7cfkpivEoVtOAP/2RNqoflmFKsUeu2UgBMB0O3 dyuY3mdoQTUW+Y9NJ4+SCmrvWmSVwQtKRgnCqnFMZ8OtzVsyG3q8gA0VDLbUgQon 533X/Am5ZP+HLb5vKPKUOKMGvSNXiVeUtSDRttl//0MsVP+KYzbfBjeipKWLbY2o MohtpYXoo4/ciZ3mC5e2xSc7asEMTOKmFgrBHR9+XScHGGaTrHFubVECZQF27DHC 37sc1rfRyuJH4kMFahTzxRtVMwu12LPQpwyjoHebQ4C4w11xQ22+4d8qsTQEAjAc 0+259aDBEJ3+Qi8kByrQc5wWq076zqBlyudWVT4nj9LNr8FpnIC/n0j0XmZ0T+vc IyS4dYeOCOcMfWRfV1AHXKZUZMbBtB9I2WWEXeUA/BKeoLGnODG0OkKXehDwiNgg 2cRI7Up7t1qktBqv4Jsp0yujVgc7EI53jSuj/qLc7k0f40IFitgl8Cdqi5ksoFH5 BwzIe6fqepTD9JQmFQs/EqKGZg/nDWdIQv3a3dhpB25EEnVDygeIqZT6eEfd+vlJ K6KX25eNgh5/GSOjse6d0WE6yneIzj6fj7FrESA7YQ1vJW7MkDp4w0Y8ZlekATdF /q43dfCUHSI0PvZYpBncIZo1LNBTxFiFnA9VeKh4WFmZZVTno2KMDH8eWiaw8GZY GocjqIk9wPKGMnjVEnsD =uo0E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
