Anne van Kesteren wrote:
-public-html
+www-archive

On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:52:29 -0800, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
So, on one hand, I have zero sympathy for any active participant in the working group who chose to attend a session on MathML who may claim to have been unaware of this work or making any statement other than the fact that while they personally did not have a chance to review it, sufficient others have for this to have been sent on behalf of the working group.

When the session was announced I got the impression it was about MathML integration (also based on a short discussion earlier with another Math WG member) and since I know something about that I attended. I had no idea MathML feedback would be discussed.

Did I suggest that you shouldn't have attended?

- Sam Ruby

Reply via email to