www-archive

Messages by Date

2010/07/08 RE: Fwd: ISSUE-117: In Widget P&C Spec, need to clarify in the spec that dir attribute does not apply to attributes that are IRIs, Numeric, Keywords, etc. The dir attribute only affects human readable strings. Phillips, Addison
2010/07/08 Fwd: Fwd: ISSUE-117: In Widget P&C Spec, need to clarify in the spec that dir attribute does not apply to attributes that are IRIs, Numeric, Keywords, etc. The dir attribute only affects human readable strings. Arthur Barstow
2010/07/07 [wbs] response to 'Grant II: Grant of License for Contributed Test Cases Published Outside a W3C Recommendation' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/07 RE: HTML WG telecon 2010-07-08 specific items Paul Cotton
2010/07/07 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/07 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/07 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/07 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/07 Re: HTML WG telecon 2010-07-08 specific items Shelley Powers
2010/07/07 HTML WG telecon 2010-07-08 specific items Shelley Powers
2010/07/07 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/06 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Reto Bachmann-Gmür
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Henry Story
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Kingsley Idehen
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Toby Inkster
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Bruno Harbulot
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Bruno Harbulot
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Nathan
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Kingsley Idehen
2010/07/06 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/06 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/06 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/06 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Toby Inkster
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Nathan
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Henry Story
2010/07/06 Re: [foaf-protocols] Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Toby Inkster
2010/07/06 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/06 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/06 Re: Standardising the foaf+ssl protocol to launch the Social Web Thomas Roessler
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/05 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/04 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/04 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/04 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/03 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/02 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of gkellogg
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 IE9 will not support aria-labelledby or aria-describedby Steven Faulkner
2010/07/01 Re: Adopt ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap Change Proposal to add usemap attribute to the canvas element Steven Faulkner
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/07/01 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/06/30 Re: Timeline on HTML WG Issues 89, 92, 93, 95, 96, 97, and 100 Shelley Powers
2010/06/30 Re: Timeline on HTML WG Issues 89, 92, 93, 95, 96, 97, and 100 Maciej Stachowiak
2010/06/30 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/06/30 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/06/30 [wbs] response to 'Making W3C the place for new Web standards' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/06/30 Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline June 30 Thomas Roessler
2010/06/30 "no perpetual enemies" Michael(tm) Smith
2010/06/29 Fwd: Re: Can a CR be published as a PR if one of its Normative references is a CR? Arthur Barstow
2010/06/29 Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline June 30 Anne van Kesteren
2010/06/29 Widget specs: normative references in draft status (as of 24-June-2010) Arthur Barstow
2010/06/29 Rationale Against Permitting Multiple Language Tags in the Content-Language Pragma Directive Lachlan Hunt
2010/06/29 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Ian Hickson
2010/06/28 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft L. David Baron
2010/06/28 Timeline on HTML WG Issues 89, 92, 93, 95, 96, 97, and 100 Shelley Powers
2010/06/27 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Bijan Parsia
2010/06/26 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Leif Halvard Silli
2010/06/26 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Ian Hickson
2010/06/26 Re: Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec Ian Hickson
2010/06/26 Re: Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec Sam Ruby
2010/06/26 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Sam Ruby
2010/06/25 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Ian Hickson
2010/06/25 Re: Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec Ian Hickson
2010/06/25 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Sam Ruby
2010/06/25 Re: Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec Sam Ruby
2010/06/25 Re: Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec Ian Hickson
2010/06/25 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Ian Hickson
2010/06/25 Re: Request for the WHATWG draft to converge with the W3C draft Sam Ruby
2010/06/22 standards for video in HTML, pre-html5 Gerald Oskoboiny
2010/06/22 Re: formal objection is still blocking publication of HTML 5 specification Shelley Powers
2010/06/22 Re: formal objection is still blocking publication of HTML 5 specification Shelley Powers
2010/06/22 Re: formal objection is still blocking publication of HTML 5 specification Philippe Le Hegaret
2010/06/22 Re: formal objection is still blocking publication of HTML 5 specification Shelley Powers
2010/06/22 Re: formal objection is still blocking publication of HTML 5 specification Maciej Stachowiak
2010/06/22 formal objection is still blocking publication of HTML 5 specification Shelley Powers
2010/06/22 Fwd: Missing flat DTDs for XHTML MP Dominique Hazael-Massieux
2010/06/22 Fwd: Errors in published XHTML MP DTDs Dominique Hazael-Massieux
2010/06/22 Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline June 30 Thomas Roessler
2010/06/22 Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline June 30 Arthur Barstow
2010/06/19 Re: Guessing geographical locations for Wikipedia article subjects Bjoern Hoehrmann
2010/06/19 Re: Guessing geographical locations for Wikipedia article subjects Karl Dubost
2010/06/19 Re: Guessing geographical locations for Wikipedia article subjects Bjoern Hoehrmann
2010/06/19 Re: Guessing geographical locations for Wikipedia article subjects Toby Inkster
2010/06/19 Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Ian Jacobs
2010/06/19 Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Anne van Kesteren
2010/06/18 Archived comments from Sec 508 Washington DC hearing May 12, 2010 Judy Brewer
2010/06/18 Archived comments from Sec 508 Santa Clara hearing March 25, 2010 Judy Brewer
2010/06/18 Guessing geographical locations for Wikipedia article subjects Bjoern Hoehrmann
2010/06/18 Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Ian Jacobs
2010/06/18 Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Karl Dubost
2010/06/18 Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Anne van Kesteren
2010/06/18 Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Karl Dubost
2010/06/18 Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Henri Sivonen
2010/06/18 Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Anne van Kesteren
2010/06/17 Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications Karl Dubost
2010/06/17 Re: Issues 93, 95, 96, 97 for the HTML WG Shelley Powers
2010/06/17 Re: Issues 93, 95, 96, 97 for the HTML WG Maciej Stachowiak
2010/06/17 if co-chairs do pursue decision Shelley Powers
2010/06/17 RE: recent email related to issues Larry Masinter
2010/06/17 Issues 93, 95, 96, 97 for the HTML WG Shelley Powers
2010/06/16 Re: Hixie tests and the CSS 2.1 Test Suite Geoffrey Sneddon
2010/06/16 Re: Hixie tests and the CSS 2.1 Test Suite Geoffrey Sneddon
2010/06/16 Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Lachlan Hunt
2010/06/16 Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Julian Reschke
2010/06/15 Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy Lachlan Hunt
2010/06/15 Hixie tests and the CSS 2.1 Test Suite Geoffrey Sneddon
2010/06/14 table-caption testcase II fantasai
2010/06/14 Re: post-w3c email hosting Karl Dubost
2010/06/14 table-caption testcase fantasai
2010/06/14 post-w3c email hosting Dan Brickley
2010/06/10 Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Sam Ruby
2010/06/10 Re: Request to halt the heartbeat publication of HTML5 WG Draft Lachlan Hunt
2010/06/09 Re: Zorba 1.2.0 XQuery/XQueryX Update Test Suite Results Andrew Eisenberg
2010/06/09 Re: Zorba 1.2.0 XQuery/XQueryX Test Suite Results Andrew Eisenberg
2010/06/08 public-webapps mailing lists stats Dominique Hazael-Massieux
2010/06/08 Re: public-html mailing lists stats Anne van Kesteren
2010/06/08 Re: public-html mailing lists stats Anne van Kesteren
2010/06/08 public-html mailing lists stats Dominique Hazael-Massieux
2010/06/03 Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element Shelley Powers
2010/05/27 RE: [widgets] Re: i18n comments: Richard Ishida
2010/05/27 RE: [widgets] Re: i18n comments: Phillips, Addison
2010/05/27 [wbs] response to 'Grant II: Grant of License for Contributed Test Cases Published Outside a W3C Recommendation' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/05/26 the unintuitive semantics of “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels” (RFC 2119) Etan Wexler
2010/05/26 Re: [widgets] Re: i18n comments: Arthur Barstow
2010/05/24 Re: Fwd: PFWG comments on View Mode Media Feature Michael Cooper
2010/05/23 border-left-width-036 fantasai
2010/05/22 RE: ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections Ian Hickson
2010/05/21 RE: [widgets] Re: i18n comments: Richard Ishida
2010/05/21 Fwd: PFWG comments on View Mode Media Feature Arthur Barstow
2010/05/21 Re: Admin changes to obsolete WebSimpleDB in deference to IndexedDB Michael(tm) Smith
2010/05/21 Re: Admin changes to obsolete WebSimpleDB in deference to IndexedDB Arthur Barstow
2010/05/21 Re: [widgets] Re: i18n comments: Arthur Barstow
2010/05/21 Admin changes to obsolete WebSimpleDB in deference to IndexedDB Arthur Barstow
2010/05/20 RE: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs CE Whitehead
2010/05/20 RE: ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs Larry Masinter
2010/05/20 RE: [widgets] Re: i18n comments: Richard Ishida
2010/05/19 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-95: Removing the hidden Attribute - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/05/19 [wbs] response to 'ISSUE-93: Removing the details Element - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of [email protected]
2010/05/19 Rationale for figure Element Issue 90 Straw Poll Laura Carlson
2010/05/19 Rationale for figure Element Issue 90 Straw Poll Laura Carlson
2010/05/19 Rationale for aside Element Issue 91 Straw Poll Laura Carlson
2010/05/19 Rationale for details Element Issue 93 Straw Poll Laura Carlson
2010/05/19 Rationale for hidden Attribute Issue 95 Straw Poll Laura Carlson
2010/05/19 Rationale for progress Element Issue 96 Straw Poll Laura Carlson
2010/05/19 Rationale for meter Attribute Issue 97 Straw Poll Laura Carlson
2010/05/19 Rationale for meter Attribute Issue 97 Straw Poll Laura Carlson
2010/05/19 Re: Applying design to W3C specs Ian Jacobs