Dan Connolly wrote:
I don't quite understand closing an issue with
an expectation that more work will be done on it
later.
I'll be more than happy to assign somebody an action item that is not
associated with an issue. Based on prior correspondence, I suspect that
any or all of Manu, Julian, or Tantek would be willing to be assigned
such an action.
The question at hand is whether this issue is a blocker and if so, is
anybody planning to active work on the issue. Brief history:
2008-06-26 Issue opened
2009-10-09 Bug opened
2009-10-20 Bug marked WONTFIX
2010-01-20 Call for Proposals
I took a brief look at the proposal...
no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0683.html
I'm not persuaded that it's not cost-effective to just
keep head/@profile in HTML 5. My position remains:
let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL
etc.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/0571.html
I'm inclined to object to this CfC, but I'll stand by to learn
a little more about the situation first.
Are you inclined to write a Change Proposal?
I'm quite willing to track actions, and blocking issues that are
actively being worked.
- Sam Ruby
