Hi Michael,
During the widget group's May 20 call, we discussed your comment [1]
and agreed the use of "tactile" was an accidental oversight and as
such, we resolved to remove it from the spec:
http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-wam-minutes.html#item07
For the purposes of closing the LC comment loop, please reply to
Robin's e-mail and indicate if you are satisfied (or not) with the
group's decision to remove "tactile".
-Thanks, Art Barstow
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/
0771.html
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Robin Berjon <[email protected]>
Date: May 20, 2010 9:51:59 AM EDT
To: Michael Cooper <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, List WAI
Liaison <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PFWG comments on View Mode Media Feature
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/21946992-D5BE-4393-A1D7-
[email protected]>
Hi Michael,
thanks a lot for your review!
On May 19, 2010, at 18:32 , Michael Cooper wrote:
The Last Call draft of the View Mode Media Feature states that it
"Applies to: visual and tactile media types"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-view-mode-20100420/#the--view-mode--
media-feature
While these view modes make sense for visual media types, they don't
seem appropriate for the two tactile media types "braille" and
"embossed", as defined in "Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1
(CSS 2.1) Specification". in Section 7.3 "Recognized media types"
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/media.html#media-types
Good catch. Listing "tactile" was unintended, it probably happened
by copying over from an existing media query description. This MF
indeed makes sense only for visual media. We have removed it from
our internal draft.
Thanks!
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
