Le lundi 13 mai 2013 à 09:16 -0400, Arthur Barstow a écrit : > I'm trying to understand the overall testing plan for Web IDL, > especially what specifically must be done to get the Web IDL v1 [CR] to > pass its CR exit criteria [Exit]. By plan here, I'd like to understand > who is doing what, (the `why` part presumably is obvious) and by when. > > We have at least the following resources and activities but I don't > quite understand how they fit together re moving the spec to PR. For > example, which efforts are required to move WebIDL to PR, is there a > commitment to complete the required pieces, which efforts are obsolete, etc. > > * Web IDL parser: there are at least two [idlharness.js] and > [webidl2.js]. Which one should be used for CR testing; has anyone > committed to maintaining and completing the parser; how is it used > vis-a-vis the CR exit criteria?
widlproc is another WebIDL parser. https://github.com/dontcallmedom/widlproc Both Webidl2.js and widlproc passes widlproc parsing test suite, as well as randomly generated test cases from the WebIDL grammar. > * Online WebIDL checker [Online]. Is this current with the Web IDL [CR]; > do we recommend it be used; is anyone maintaining this or do we consider > it obsolete? It is up to date for the parsing part, and should be accurate (if not exhaustive) for the more semantic aspects. I am maintaining it (although I'm not putting a lot of resources into it) Dom > [Online] <http://www.w3.org/2009/07/webidl-check>
