On 13/05/2013 15:16 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
* Web IDL parser: there are at least two [idlharness.js] and [webidl2.js]. Which one should be used for CR testing; has anyone committed to maintaining and completing the parser; how is it used vis-a-vis the CR exit criteria?
idlharness.js is not a WebIDL parser, it uses webidl2.js under the hood. As Dom said however, we do have wildproc. Both are believed to be as correct as we can figure out.
* Cameron's Web IDL tests submitted May 12 [Cameron]. How does this relate to Travis' plan and the parser work?
I was hoping that that would actually be enough to transition. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
