On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > What appears indeed to be a problem is the text in section 7b of the Member > Agreement, and section 2.2 of the Invited Expert and Collaborator Agreement. > I've asked about this on the public-w3process list: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0156.html
The reply from Michael there does not inspire confidence. The Dual License is not GPL-compatible and is a far cry from CC0. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
