On 11/24/2014 10:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
Anne seems to have come to the conclusion that "the
moment a non-W3C document enters W3C space, it can no longer be developed
outside the W3C". I see nothing that supports that conclusion.
I continue to dislike that you keep quoting me out of context without
asking for clarification from me first.
I linked to the full context. I copied you in the email in the hopes
that you would provide additional context, if such were needed. I see
that you have now done so, and for that, I thank you.
The condition you're missing is that it would be the same person
editing the document. I cannot edit X inside and outside the W3C
simultaneously.
That condition was not in your email. Whether or not Jeff led you to
believe this is in dispute. Either way, I see nothing in the existing
Membership or Invited Expert agreements that supports this claim.
I will now ask you for clarification as to why you believe this claim to
be true.
Which is one of the now many reasons why the WHATWG
follows "Hypothetical" #1, without it really being hypothetical.
I will now ask you for clarification as to what the other reasons are
that the WHATWG would not be willing to collaborate on the URL
Specification.
I remain interested in collaborating with everybody.
- Sam Ruby
