On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Dirk Balfanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was an objection that site-meta (which is served over http) should > not be authoritative for email: URI schemes, but I think that was voted down > :-) > > I'm sorta new to these lists, but were you meaning to say that site-meta *will* be authoritative for email: URI schemes, or that such an idea was voted down (and thus, site-meta will *not* be authoritative for email: URI schemes)? David
