* Juraj Variny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04.12.03 06:56]: > On Monday 01 December 2003 20:42, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> > 2) is there any benefit from running WWWOFFLE and ziproxy in tandem; and > > if so, how? > > > Overall real benefit is that wwwoffle fetches take about half the time. Thank you for the prompt response. This was exactly what I was hoping would happen - and it will become of increasing interest since my (future) ISP charges by connect-time and not by download-size. And his charges are a lot more than I pay at present. > it depends on the remote server whether he uses to send compressed > responses or not. Ziproxy can compress all responses. > And with that advice all my previous confusions return. README.compress - assuming that I have understood what it says - indicates that, provided that the server uses to HTTP 1.1 protocol, files are sent in compressed format if the receiving browser can handle that format. And WWWOFFLE-2.8, with zlib installed, presumably can. So if the time of WWWOFFLE fetches can be halved, what points to "127.0.01", what listens at port 8080 and what port entry - referring to ziproxy - goes into /etc/services? Finally, ziproxy give just too many choices - use with xinetd, with inetd or (from the commandline) with netd. So, which? Felix Karpfen -- Felix Karpfen Public Key 72FDF9DF (DH/DSA)
