herbert breunung <deirdre_s...@web.de> writes: > Am 14.07.2010 22:01, schrieb Johan Vromans: > > Why not use wxGlade and generate wxPerl directly? > > because that code isn't perfect and you have to touch it anyway.
TIMTOWTDI You can have wxGlade generate the code and then modify it manually. If you obey the wxGlade protected regions you can use wxGlade to make UI changes and regenerate the code over and over again. If you don't obey the protected regions, well, it's a one time thing. Still very useful to get going. Alternatively, you can leave the wxGlade generated code untouched and derive your own classes from the wxGlade generated classes. So you still have a nice abstracttion level and, believe me, there's still an awful lot to teach! I'd consider the latter approach a wxGlade 'best practice'. -- Johan
