We're currently looking to package 90+ apps into a distribution. We're testing Cava and its looking pretty good so far.
Jeff On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 23:43 +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: > Currently, I know of three packagers that can handle wxPerl > applications: Cava, PAR and PerlApp. Each have pros and cons. > > I have some biggish applications that share a collection of modules. In > fact, each application only differs in the Main module. The applications > call each other when necessary. > > I can, of course, pack each application individually but that would > result in a big waste of resources (and probably performance). So I > guess this can be done much smarter. > > The question is: how? > To eliminate one possibility: switching to threads instead of calling > the other applications is currently not feasible. > > -- Johan > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________
